eviltoast
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
BrikoX@lemmy.zipM to Global News@lemmy.zipEnglish · 1 year ago

China now faces 245% Trump tariff

www.newsweek.com

external-link
message-square
62
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • politics@lemmy.world
  • progressivepolitics@lemmy.world
  • worldnews@lemmy.ml
212
external-link

China now faces 245% Trump tariff

www.newsweek.com

BrikoX@lemmy.zipM to Global News@lemmy.zipEnglish · 1 year ago
message-square
62
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • politics@lemmy.world
  • progressivepolitics@lemmy.world
  • worldnews@lemmy.ml
The White House said the higher tariff is as a result of Chinese retaliation.

The White House said the higher tariff is as a result of Chinese retaliation.

Archived version: https://archive.is/20250416092702/https://www.newsweek.com/china-245-trump-tariff-2060295


Disclaimer: The article linked is from a single source with a single perspective. Make sure to cross-check information against multiple sources to get a comprehensive view on the situation.

alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • moshankey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    89
    ·
    1 year ago

    A million bajillion percent.

    • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      ·
      1 year ago

      • Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        Muwahahaha!!

    • BrikoX@lemmy.zipOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Indeed. It’s at the point the exact number is irrelevant.

    • casmael@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      Infinity percent No backsies runs away

      • moshankey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Me first! Smoke bomb!

    • Lembot_0001@lemm.eedeleted by creator
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      deleted by creator

    • SpikesOtherDog@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You beat me to it by a mile.

  • wirebeads@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s fun to watch just how incredibly fucked America is becoming on the global scale.

    It’s being led down a path of isolation by a Nazi syphilis infected rapist who acts like a toddler at nap time throwing a temper tantrum because he wasn’t able to get the juice box he wanted.

    • JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      “fun” like the pejorative “fun”, right?

    • Samskara@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It fucks lots of people around the globe. I don’t see any fun this.

      • 小莱卡@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        the US going down is objectively a good thing for most of the people on the world.

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean, if the fuckwits had to win at least nobody’s going to have any fun.

    • jaxxed@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s just such an asinine way to go down.

  • expatriado@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    1 year ago

    China US consumers

  • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    1 year ago

    Will probably see further movements from the PRC to sell off US treasury bonds and shifting more away from the dollar in general, along with tighter export restrictions on rare Earth. China already said they won’t keep increasing tariffs, but they seem dedicated to not backing down, and they have the Material means to actually resist US trade aggression.

    What would be incredibly based is if the PRC starts paying off loans in Africa with its dollars, decoupling the Global South from the US even further. Gets rid of dollars and debt in the Global South, potentially freeing up new customers for goods produced in China and strengthening ties.

    • stink@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think they’ll most likely give out loans in USD and get repayment in Yuan. Eventually becoming the globally traded currency

      • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        Would be another strategy for sure.

      • Bloobish [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        timmy-pray

  • huf [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 year ago

    He found a bigger number somewhere?

    • Lemmygradwontallowme [he/him, it/its]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      He’ll find another. I bet 420%

      • huf [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        nah, elon’s holding that one with a death grip

  • graycube@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The US is only 4% of the world’s population. We may have more US dollars than anywhere else, but 96% of the world is still a sizable potential market.

    • tetris11@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      4% of the world population with 90% of the world wealth though…

      • Lembot_0001@lemm.eedeleted by creator
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        deleted by creator

        • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          We can only hope

          • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I feel like I may owe the accelerationists an apology if this causes dedollarization.

      • Darkard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Remove the oligarchs from that calculation.

      • Espectro Vermelho@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        According to the IMF, the US has 15% of the world PPP GDP, versus China’s 20%.

  • ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 year ago

    Title should be “Americans face 245% Trump tariff on China”

  • Etterra@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is so far beyond stupid that it’s wrapped around, overshot smart, and plunged into stupid again.

    • BagOfHeavyStones@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Gonna need more than eight bits soon.

  • Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

  • PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    Welp when the debt defaults and everyone stops using American dollars or hold their gold here, then better hope we don’t all become forced to use crypto like El Salvador (which is probably the blueprint plan).

    • CorneliusTalmadge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Maybe it is the plan…

  • kubica@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    I shouldn’t be laughing but…

  • TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    Next stop: trade embargo

    • Trihilis@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nah, its not over 9000 yet.

      • TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        We could call it the BFT 9000.

  • Hestia [she/her, fae/faer]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    China should just one up him in a way that doesn’t let him one up them: complete embargo

    • samus12345@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Oh yeah? Complete embargo PLUS ONE!!”

      • happybadger [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        245% embargo. If you dare try to export things to the US, you’re getting 245% of it back.

        • samus12345@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          The bad part being that the stuff over 100% will be poorly-made American knockoffs.

  • millie@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    This headline is bullshit. The correct headline would be “Americans now face 245% Trump tariff on Chinese goods”. No need to spread misinformation about how tariffs work.

  • Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Doesn’t matter whether it’s a 80% (or whatever it was, basically changes on a whim) or 245%. There is no difference.

    • Frozengyro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      It does make a difference. Let’s say a thing you need about once a month to run your business was 10 dollars from China. You can get a similar product in the US, but it’s 30 dollars. At 80%, it’s still cheaper to get from China, 18 bucks. At 245%, it’s now 24.50 to buy from China. Still cheaper than buying from the US, but now way more expensive.

      I know these are made up numbers, but it isn’t that unusual for US made items to be 3-10x the price of making it in ‘cheap labor’ countries. Also, this assumes there is a comparative replacement made in the US. But many machine parts have no analog or are proprietary, you must buy it from China or end that part of your business.

      • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Your point is fairly good but you need to recheck your math. At 145% a $10 product will be $24.50. At 245% it’s gonna be $34.50. And that doesn’t even take into account additional federal, state, and local taxes.

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      It was 145% last, before the current rate, for those curious. It only further cements your point, it no longer has real impact, importing from China is just as dead.

      • TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        These numbers are absolutely wild. Has anyone made a site for tracking this madness?

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Many, it’s all over the news. It seemingly changes based on emotion though, we thought it was 125% but it was really 145%.

          • TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’ve seen a bunch of articles, each with just the latest number and a date. In order to make a nice graph out of all of them, I would need to set up some sort of webscraping project to pool the numbers together. I’ve also seen a bunch of articles that have other types of graphs and tables that don’t really answer my question. The data is out there, but it’s scattered all over the place.

            • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Don’t know of any, sorry!

Global News@lemmy.zip

globalnews@lemmy.zip

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !globalnews@lemmy.zip

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn’t have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title format

Post title should mirror the news source title. If you don’t like the title of article, look for an alternative source instead of editorializing it.

URL format

Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.

[Opinion] prefix

Opinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title. Opinion articles refer to articles that their publisher doesn’t explictly endorse.

Country prefix

Country prefix can be added to the title with a separator (|, :, etc.) if the news is from a local publisher who doesn’t clearly mention the country.


Rules

This community is moderated in accordance with the principles outlined in Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which emphasizes the right to freedom of opinion and expression. In addition to this foundational principle, we have some additional rules to ensure a respectful and constructive environment for all users.

1. English only

Title and associated content has to be in English.

2. No social media posts

Avoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.

3. Respectful communication

All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.

4. Inclusivity

Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation. Any kind of discrimination will not be tolerated.

5. Ad hominem attacks

Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can’t argue your position without attacking a person’s character, you already lost the argument.

6. Off-topic tangents

Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.

7. Instance rules may apply

If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities
  • !legalnews@lemmy.zip - International and local legal news.
  • !technology@lemmy.zip - News community around technology, social media platforms, information technology and governmental policy surrounding it.
  • !interestingshare@lemmy.zip - Fascinating articles, captivating images, satisfying videos, interesting projects, stunning research and more.
  • !europe@lemmy.dbzer0.com - News and information about Europe.
  • !usa@midwest.social - News and information about United States of America.

Icon generated via LLM model | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 455 users / day
  • 1.75K users / week
  • 2.35K users / month
  • 7.7K users / 6 months
  • 2 local subscribers
  • 6.9K subscribers
  • 18.4K Posts
  • 41.4K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • BrikoX@lemmy.zip
  • BE: 0.19.20
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org