• Blibly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 days ago

    “We avoid hiring people with a sense of self-worth so we can exploit them.”

  • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 days ago

    They’re saying the quiet part out loud, but does anybody really think the other studios that practice crunch don’t filter applicants the same way?

    Support indies.

    • warm@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 days ago

      It’s UE5 slop, nothing special about it except for the marketing campaign. It will be irrelevant sooner rather than later.

      • JokeDeity@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        16 days ago

        The only reason I have seen the name is because someone on my friends list keeps playing it and he’s THE target for advertising, he buys every trend, lol. So that all makes perfect sense. I ended up looking it up and while I like the idea of big battlefields, they’re not the only game offering that (even though they pretend they are in their ads), and that was all that was appealing, the animations looked god awful in the trailer and you could tell they were cutting every clip short to hide jank.

        • warm@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          16 days ago

          It is very jank. But people are blind to all that these days.

          Beyond all the technical woes… It’s just a tower camping simulator. Teams huddle on towers, build mortars, get sniped at. The big battlefield is a facade, 80% of the map is used as a respawn timer, area you have to cover to get back to the action. There’s no front, so you are constantly shot in the back. Once the streamers are bored it will die, it’s already bleeding players.

  • Johnny_Arson [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    16 days ago

    The existence of “crunch” and its acceptance is so diabolical. Like it is normalized as a simple fact of software management when in reality it is just combinations of piss poor project management, and hyper-exploitive demands of the people not actually experiencing the crunch. It’s just greed and poor planning from the top.

  • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    15 days ago

    A quick list of their games, so you can easily add them to your blacklist, as per their own website and Steam developer page.

    • Wardogs
    • Killrun
    • Battalion 1944
    • Battalion: Legacy
    • The Turing Test
    • Pneuma: Breath of Life

    When you open their website, the text ‘Be the change you want to see’ shows up before loading the rest of the page. Very interesting.

    Also interesting is some history behind their Battalion 1944 game. From Wikipedia:

    The project ended up being very controversial after the developers failed to launch the promised console versions despite selling keys for PlayStation 4 and Xbox One digital copies during the Kickstarter campaign. The development focused fully on the PC version and thousands of console gamers were left out of pocket with no game and no communication from Bulkhead.[10] The console version was officially cancelled on August 9, 2022, with the PC version going free to play.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battalion_1944

    Looks like an absolute piece of shit of a studio.

    • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 days ago

      I was too. Reading comments here I was like “damn I know it’s a common critique of Christian churches discouraging critical thinking and independence but damn we have some militent atheist in this thread”.

      Thank you for the comment I was just full going with the wrong info

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    16 days ago

    “A lot of people that may have an issue with crunch - rightly so, I understand that issue, we always try and avoid it, but we don’t hide that this is going to happen at some point - they often don’t make it in the door,” he said.

    Brammer painted this as being down to Bulkhead seeking to be known as “a place you come to work hard”. “If you care about the work you’re making and the result of what you make here, you’ll feel really valued,” he continued. "If you don’t, you will feel slave-driven. We check people’s socials, and if you’re constantly tweeting anti-crunch messaging: ‘This should never ever be a thing’, we know that and go, ‘Look, you’re not going to be happy here, so we’re not going to go with you’."

    So…

    They don’t interview people who constantly complain about a shitty but unavoidable part of the job.

    They just had a massive launch, it’s not even a week in and they already had a crunch.

    If a potential employee doesn’t want that, what the fuck do people want them to do?

    Hire them anyway and then fire them when they can’t handle a crunch? Just lie to employees and then toss them away later?

    How is a company being honest a bad thing?

    • SPRUNTnsfw@fedinsfw.app
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 days ago

      You seem to think that crunch is mandatory in the industry. Crunch is the result of poorly-managed products and c-suite deadlines. Any bonus or incentive to meet those deadlines never filters down to the worker. If the product ships on time and meets goals, management will be rewarded and the workers will reach the ends of their contracts and be shown the door.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        16 days ago

        You seem to think that crunch is mandatory in the industry. Crunch is the result of poorly-managed products and c-suite deadlines

        Explain their launch then…

        But did you even read that quote?

        A lot of people that may have an issue with crunch - rightly so, I understand that issue, we always try and avoid it, but we don’t hide that this is going to happen at some point

        They didn’t say a crunch was “mandatory” it’s not part of the planned process.

        But (just like the launch) things will go badly and there will be a rush to fix it. That is a crunch.

        The game is not finished, there’s up to two years of early access and a shit ton of stuff to be added. If the Devs promised there would be zero crunches, they would be lying.

        Acknowledging that not everything will be perfect is the most important step in limiting how much goes wrong.

        I don’t know how average adults don’t understand that.

        Quick edit:

        Now that I think about it, every post in this community is from the bot mod, and the only time there’s comments it’s always terrible takes. And mods apparently ban people for downvoting the bot spam…

        I’m out.

    • ルルㇲ@retrofed.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 days ago

      you will feel slave-driven

      How did you ignore the blatant red flag Wardogs studio doesn’t have employees, but slaves crunching for Joe Brammer‽