Jim East
I am not Jim West.
- 1.11K Posts
- 352 Comments
Jim East@slrpnk.netOPto
Earth, Environment, and Geosciences@mander.xyz•Scientists Create Durable Biodegradable Bamboo Plastic That’s Stronger Than Petroleum-Based MaterialsEnglish
1·2 days agoFor the automotive industry, I think that they mean Interior parts that aren’t exposed to the weather.
I am a furry woodland creature, and I approve this meme.
EDIT: I am using “furry” as a synonym for “mammalian” here.
my bees
my goats and chickens and cows
Owning other beings as property is not solarpunk.
Jim East@slrpnk.netto
Solarpunk Farming@slrpnk.net•What is the best way to deal with this little one eating my apricots?English
7·9 days agoI second the recommendation of neem oil spray if it’s practical to grow/obtain in your area. Just wash the fruits before eating. Otherwise you might consider a spray made from fermented tobacco leaves, and same thing, wash thoroughly before eating.
Jim East@slrpnk.netto
collapse@lemmy.zip•New data raises questions about how much the Earth has warmed | CNNEnglish
3·11 days agoOf course humans have affected the climate more than the data since 1850 would suggest. Humans were cutting and burning forests for thousands of years before the industrial revolution, leading to desertification of entire regions. All of that deforestation and its associated emissions of carbon dioxide undoubtedly has influenced how climate change has proceeded to this day.
Jim East@slrpnk.netto
vegan@lemmy.world•What do you think of the TV show Pluribus? (From a vegan perspective)English
5·12 days agoAs a logical conclusion of this course of action of only consuming a diet of basically fruits and humans who died naturally, the hivemind acknowledges that they will eventually run out of food and starve to death
I’m not familiar with this fictional world, so I may be missing something obvious, but is there something preventing them from planting more fruit trees?
Jim East@slrpnk.netto
Climate Crisis, Biosphere & Societal Collapse@sopuli.xyz•Mexico’s industrial boomtown is making goods for the US. Residents say they’re ‘breathing poison’English
3·25 days agoOne of the highest emitters in recent years was the Cadereyta refinery, run by Mexico’s state-owned oil company Petróleos Mexicanos (Pemex). The plant can also be seen from satellites in space as one of the biggest emitters in the world of sulphur dioxide, which contributes to smog.
Ironically, whether they know it or not, a refinery with such high sulphur dioxide emissions is actually countering climate change by cooling the Earth…
Jim East@slrpnk.netto
Earth, Environment, and Geosciences@mander.xyz•Death and devastation: why a rare equatorial cyclone and other storms have hit southern Asia so hardEnglish
2·25 days agoThe closest cyclone to the equator was the 2001 Tropical Storm Vamei which formed at just 1.4°N. Cyclone Senyar formed at 3.8°N.
The safe zone at the equator is narrow. If choosing to settle near the coast, there really isn’t much choice when it comes to latitude.

Jim East@slrpnk.netto
Solarpunk@slrpnk.net•Would be possible to have a smart city without the surveillance?English
6·1 month agoIt is both a technological and a political issue. The technology would need to be designed in such a way as to not collect “sensitive” data about anyone and to anonymise whatever data needs to be collected. This would not be simple to implement in a way that would prevent abuse, but the example of a motion sensor rather than a video camera would be the sort of thing that I imagine. To what extent a “smart city” could be developed using only privacy-respecting technology, I don’t know, but at least some options do exist.
Jim East@slrpnk.netto
Solarpunk@slrpnk.net•Would be possible to have a smart city without the surveillance?English
6·1 month agoThis begs the question, would it be possible in a world without politicians? In an anarchist society, for example, where capitalism and the state have been abolished, could there be a technologically-advanced “smart city” that did not violate anyone’s privacy? I think that that is the more interesting question. In the world as it is today, of course this would not work.
For those who cannot self-host:
Jim East@slrpnk.netto
Fedigrow@lemmy.zip•Where do you draw the line on NSFW content?English
1·1 month ago👍
Jim East@slrpnk.netto
Fedigrow@lemmy.zip•Where do you draw the line on NSFW content?English
11·1 month agoI can’t speak for anyone else, but to me that seemed to imply that you were suggesting it as a solution that might be worth trying, not as something worth trying that might be a solution. Language is tricky.
Jim East@slrpnk.netto
Fedigrow@lemmy.zip•Where do you draw the line on NSFW content?English
2·1 month agoThat’s what I thought too, but I could be wrong.
Jim East@slrpnk.netto
Fedigrow@lemmy.zip•Where do you draw the line on NSFW content?English
11·1 month agoFair enough, but it would make sense to include a “this may or may not help” when suggesting something that requires setting up a new account like this would.
Jim East@slrpnk.netto
Fedigrow@lemmy.zip•Where do you draw the line on NSFW content?English
2·1 month agoSo are you proposing that OP marks such posts as NSFL instead? Do posts marked as NSFL get more engagement than posts marked NSFW? You could be correct, but I don’t think that it’s obvious from your comment how your suggestion solves the issue.
Jim East@slrpnk.netto
Fedigrow@lemmy.zip•Where do you draw the line on NSFW content?English
9·1 month agoRespectfully, I don’t think that this answers the question.
Jim East@slrpnk.netto
Fedigrow@lemmy.zip•What are your approach to moderating a Lemmy Community?English
4·2 months agore: politics, if you subscribe to the Platonian/Aristotelian system of philosophy, then banning all discussion of an entire branch of philosophy… doesn’t make much sense. If you think through which specific behaviours that tend to arise in political discussions would be a problem for you, or which specific topics in politics are unlikely to lead to productive discussions, then you can make rules pertaining to those things rather than banning politics entirely. Of course this depends on how much time and effort you are willing to put in as a moderator to determine whether a post about politics violates the rules. Just an idea.
EDIT: I see that you have the community up and running with some rules in the sidebar. You might consider adding a rule about citing sources for empirical claims that are not common knowledge (or something to that effect). I imagine that that would help to keep political discussions civil and productive.






















Chilling. Truly a “guys, I think we’re fucked” thought.