minus-squaretempestuousknave@ttrpg.networktoRPGMemes @ttrpg.network•I could write for WotClinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·3 years agoIn Icewind Dale it was a Loris. No other text was changed. linkfedilink
minus-squaretempestuousknave@ttrpg.networkOPtoD&D Next - 5e Discussion@ttrpg.network•Minor Illusion Ruling: revelation does not require an actionlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 years agoSolid argument, you’ve just changed my ruling! linkfedilink
minus-squaretempestuousknave@ttrpg.networkOPtoD&D Next - 5e Discussion@ttrpg.network•Minor Illusion Ruling: revelation does not require an actionlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 years agoI try to keep npc reactions to solid-snaking pc’s appropriately tiered: Apparate a crate over yourself while in melee? First enemy attack is disadvantage, second straight. Apparate a crate to hide in a PC’s house? Definitely getting investigated on sight. Apparate a crate in a packed warehouse - likely to go unnoticed. linkfedilink
tempestuousknave@ttrpg.network to 3d6@ttrpg.network · 3 years agoShadowbladelockplus-squaremessage-squaremessage-square0linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1message-squareShadowbladelockplus-squaretempestuousknave@ttrpg.network to 3d6@ttrpg.network · 3 years agomessage-square0linkfedilink
tempestuousknave@ttrpg.network to D&D Next - 5e Discussion@ttrpg.network · 3 years agoMinor Illusion Ruling: revelation does not require an actionplus-squaremessage-squaremessage-square2linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1message-squareMinor Illusion Ruling: revelation does not require an actionplus-squaretempestuousknave@ttrpg.network to D&D Next - 5e Discussion@ttrpg.network · 3 years agomessage-square2linkfedilink
In Icewind Dale it was a Loris. No other text was changed.