I understand now, you don’t know how to be constructive, and discouragement is your aim.

Ok, If you feel the information has large errors, then provide some constructive feedback and I will consider updating the bite size paragraph of information. What you are doing is actually both criticising wikipedia and insulting my ability to summarize. Both of these are not constructive to my work, time and effort that I am putting into this project as a benefit to people who may really want to learn something. If this is the kind of push back I’m getting for a non-profit science project, in a science community, that discourages me from wanting to post anything here at all. Is that your aim?

The information is from wikipedia yes, there is a link to the wikipedia article if you want to read more linked see “Source”. The whole idea is to present bite sized info that is not written by AI… and encourage further reading. If you feel the information is incorrect, then perhaps you need to edit the wikipedia article.

This is a good developer project idea. I will post the idea in foss communities.

You might be interested to know that Creative Commons has a statement of No AI. https://opensource.creativecommons.org/contributing-code/

There is a fun animation that goes along with light-seconds that you can see here. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/72/Earth_and_Moon_Size_and_Distance_scale_-_with_real-time_light_speed!.webm

This is neat, thank you

Article added to https://noailist.org/why-no-ai

I can’t find a source for this stat, would you mind sharing one?

Thank you, I edited it to include the 20% stat from wikipedia

The website is using https://textpattern.com/about/ - but I’d like to make the source open, any tips on how I can upload the source to something like codeberg.org would be appreciated, as I havn’t been able to figure out how to do that yet.

This website is really “no AI use at all”, and part of that is to encourage learning, working slowly and carefully. There are ways to obtain similar information without the use of AI, and often times it can lead you to more resourceful information that you can learn from, instead of a ‘quick and easy’ answer just to get the job done.

ml is initials of the rest of my name, ive used the screen name for a very long time

No worries, thanks for the update, due to the reports of AI usage from several piefed users, and due to a lack of an official response, I have moved the entire project to a different better platform that states they are against using AI.

This was very very helpful, thank you, I’ve added all the AI-free alternatives.

Ok, I will try to add that on there, thank you.

Let me know the specifics of your AI free logo, and I’ll see what I can come up with.

Thank you, this is helpful to know.

Thanks for the feedback, the javascript might be part of the Ghost theme. When you said “doesnt work with just the site domain permitted.” - could you please explain this part for me? I might consider moving away from Ghost if it has multiple problems.

I thought about adding projects without asking for permission, but it doesn’t seem right, they might not agree with all the reasons why a project might not use ai listed on the website too.