If they sent them to the Hague, then Trump would just send the US military to the Hague to rescue them by “all means necessary” and it would all be entirely legal, frankly because the USA is a country run predominantly by criminals.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Service-Members'_Protection_Act (aka Hague Invasion Act)
Well well, some very lucky ICE agents moving up in the world - first they were just Gestapo but now they’re graduating to full SS.
Correct spelling is the fundamental component of words, without words there is no vocabulary. Without understanding words, LLMs have absolutely no understanding of vocabulary. They can certainly spew out things they’ve tokenized and weighted from ingested inputs though - like when people trick it into believing false definitions through simply repeating them as correct and thereby manipulating (or poisoning) the weighting. ChatGPT and other LLMs regularly fail to interpret common parts of vocabulary - eg idioms, word spellings, action-reaction consequences in a sentence. They’re fancy autocomplete, filled with stolen (and occasionally licensed) data.
Sure seems like the problem isn’t me or the other guy ‘dont know how to use LLMs’, but rather that they keep getting sold as something they’re not.
Congrats though, you just used a 100 billion dollar machine array to more or less output the exact content of a Wikipedia article - you really proved your point that it’s very good when you know what to ask it, and us plebs are just dumb at questions, or something 👍 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Platitude
The ongoing shitfuckery by the US in forcing their corporations to hand over sovereign-nation data hosted in other nations datacenters (CLOUD Act), amongst many of their present stupidities, is fucking amazing for IT sovereignty and open source.
I couldn’t have convinced the organizations and businesses I worked with in the past to move to more than a few niche open source products for tiny userbases, which I made sure they donated to. To suggest moving to a solution outside of the Garner Magic Quadrant for that particular business need / role for anything larger than dozen users was just “objectively illogical”, I couldn’t have put forth a winning business case proposal in 100 years.
But now they’re doing it out of spite to the US government and finally seeing the light.
There’s a lot of bad things going on in the world, but this… this is great.
This is the ‘next level natural language technology’?
Always some AI white knights in the comments, bravely telling people ‘you’re using AI wrong. you’re ignorant. you’re uneducated about generative AI’, as though this isn’t literally the first thing that the market-leader OpenAI suggests you use it for presently.
Claude is AMAZING. The future is now! Its actually very hard to trip it up with complex trick questions like “Spell ‘blueberry’” nowadays. Check out what it said when I asked it just now what tomorrow’s date is (I even gave this doctorate degree-level intellect a clue that it’s in 2026).
I asked it to show its reasoning so I could help it to understand my complex query, and got this very insightful reasoning process.
Reasoning…
Wearegiven:“Whatdateof2026isittomorrow?“Note:Thecurrentyearis2023,sotheuserisaskingaboutafuturedaterelativetoanunknown"today"in2026.However,withoutknowingthecurrentdate(in2026)wecannotcompute"tomorrow”.Thus,wemustclarifythattheanswerdependsonthecurrentdate.Butnote:Theusermightbeaskingthisquestiononaspecificday,sowecanassumethatthe"today"inthequestionisthedaywhenthequestionisbeingasked?However,thequestionisabout2026,whichisinthefuture.Sincewedon’thaveaspecificreferencedatein2026,wecannotgiveaspecificanswer.Therefore,thethoughtprocessshouldleadtoaresponsethatexplainsthedependencyandperhapsprovidesawaytocomputeitifthecurrentdatewereknown.Let’sbreakdown:1.Thequestion:“Whatdateof2026isittomorrow?”-Thisimpliesthattomorrowisadayintheyear2026.2.However,thecurrentdate(the"today"fromwhichwearecountingtomorrow)isnotprovided.Withoutknowingtoday’sdatein2026,wecannotdeterminetomorrow’sdate.3.Possibilities:a)Iftheuserisaskingthisquestionin2026,thenwecouldusethecurrentdate.Butthecurrentyearis2023,sowearenotin2026.b)Theusermightbeaskinghypothetically,butwithoutareference,wecannotcompute.4.Therefore,theanswermustbeconditionalonknowingthecurrentdate.5.Wecanprovideageneralmethod:-Tomorrow’sdatein2026isonedayafterthecurrentdate(whichmustbein2026).-Forexample,iftodayisJanuary1,2026,thentomorrowisJanuary2,2026.6.Butnote:Thequestionsays"dateof2026”,soweareonlyconcernedwithdatesintheyear2026.IftodayisDecember31,2026,thentomorrowwouldbeJanuary1,2027,whichisnotin2026.Sothequestionimpliesthattomorrowmustalsobein2026.7.Therefore,theanswerisonlydefinedfordatesin2026fromJanuary1toDecember30(becauseonDecember31,tomorrowwouldbein2027).SowemustalsonotethatifthecurrentdateisDecember31,2026,thentomorrowisnotin2026.8.Approachfortheresponse:-Explainthatwithoutknowingthecurrentdatein2026,wecannotgiveaspecificanswer.-Providethegeneralrule:tomorrow’sdateisthenextdayinthecalendarafterthecurrentdate.-NotethatthecurrentdatemustbebetweenJanuary1,2026andDecember30,2026fortomorrowtoalsobein2026.-Iftheuserhasaspecificcurrentdateinmind,theycanprovideitandwecancompute.9.However,notethattheusermightbeaskingthisonaparticularday(say,thedaytheyareaskingthequestion)butin2026?Thatdoesn’tmakesensebecausewearein2023.Sowemustclarifythatwearein2023and2026isinthefuture.10.Alternativeinterpretation:Theusermightbeaskingforthedateoftomorrowintheyear2026,meaningiftodayisthesamedayoftheyearin2026asitisnowin2023?Butthatisnotastandardinterpretationandthequestiondoesnotspecify.11.Conclusion:Thequestionisambiguouswithoutareferencepoint.Wemustaskforthecurrentdatein2026orexplainthatweneedthatinformation.Butnote:Theusermightbeaskingthisquestiononaspecificday(say,June15,2023)andwanttoknowwhatdateitwouldbetomorrowin2026?Thatis,thesamedayoftheyear?However,thequestiondoesnotspecifythat.Let’sre-read:"Whatdateof2026isittomorrow?“Thisisambiguous.Itcouldmean:OptionA:“Iftodayissomedayin2026,whatdateistomorrow(in2026)?”->requiresknowingtodayin2026.OptionB:“Whatistomorrow’sdate(in2023)andthenwhatwouldthatsamedaybein2026?”->butthatwouldbethesamedayoftheyear,buttheyearchanges.However,thequestionsays"dateof2026”,soOptionBwouldnotbeadatein2026iftomorrowin2023isin2023.Forexample
I pressed ‘Stop’ because I’m pretty sure the poor guy was in a logic loop, and I didn’t want to heat up the oceans any further with my diabolically-complex line of query.
That’s an interesting perspective. Trump leaning on his lessons from working with the mob?
If they keep gaming the courts and depriving people of their legal protections I fear it will become more like the Dropkick Murphy’s deep hole. I know there’s lots of people on Lemmy that are fed up and are championing violence, and understandably so, but I’m sure any violence against the MAGA state will come a step costs.
Wild that this dumb fuck Bondi thinks she has leverage in this situation to make demands.
Or maybe this MicroAggressions Killer product is completely harmless to her in this fictional comic.
There’s the Linux Mint main distro build off Ubuntu and a separate Linux Mint Debian distro build directly from Deb.
Specificity is useful, especially in the context that you said “Mint is built on Debian so it’s stable as fuck” - well actually, not directly. It’s built on Ubuntu, which a lot of people complain has a more bloat and thus less stability than Debian.
Personally I’ve not had issues with any of the three, they’re all good, but there are differences. Mint includes a number of packages that Debian does not (PPAs, Snap, Wayland infegration), because it’s inherited them all from Ubuntu. Mint is 64-bit whereas Debian supports 32/64 and other architectures, because again… Mint (standard) is based on Ubuntu, which is 64-bit only.
Oh, they’re not but I guess you’d have to ask him for the answer. Those videos are both still up if you want to watch a long stream of misogyny and logical fallacies dressed up as an ‘owning’.
Only Linux Mint Debian Edition is built on Debian. Linux Mint (main) is built on Ubuntu.
Yes please. We go from ANZAC day in April to fucking December 25th before we get another public holiday in most of Australia.
I dread that ‘public holiday drought’ every year.
Move it to early September or something. Skips the worst of winter and breaks up the work year better.
In the context of the post it’s domination, enforced subservience, not sexually motivated. Not homophobic.
You won’t understand this though because I just had a look at your post history and you’re a tankie that seems to spend 95% of their time seeing liberals in every shadow and complaining loudly that they are the source of all evil.
The “Why ‘Feminism’ is poisoning atheism”, “Feminism Vs FACTS” chud?
I’m surprised he still has an audience tbh. Well, sadly not that surprised.
Yes, the speed is affected by the mood of the vacuum. The happier the vacuum the faster the speed of light. I recommend a Henry if you’re trying to achieve top speed.
I’m well aware, another of Nestlé’s evils. Nothing about either of our points in the article though, which assumes its purely a supply problem and doesn’t offer the obvious solution: public education programs to encourage mothers to prioritize breast milk over formula. They speak of it primarily as a business problem.
Tell them they’re using one of the oldest logical fallacies, and Ancient philosophers would be embarrassed by them.
I think they’re referring to the name of the company being very similar to “immutable”, no?