I don’t want to use swearwords. I hope I’m allowed not to in this freedom you’re telling me about.

How I miss the “do one thing and do it well” attitude in commercial services. Why do they have to convert any nice product into a s.itshow? It can’t be that investors want good services to become worse…

From how you describe your context (similar to mine), you don’t seem to need to backup images. Few local images mean little impact of possible failures.

We would have to make it sustainable eventually, since it’s the only practical way for passengers to travel between americas/australia/afroeurasia. I guess something hydrogen-based is the most likely candidate for reducing the carbon impact.

Hoovering and hydrofoils have been under-explored, but yes, speed is necessary for long-distance travel.

Defining “green” as energy consumption is quite exotic. More commonly it has to do with resource (carbon and others) footprint.

deleted by creator

Given all the comments missing the point (also written in the title), I appreciate that yours would pass the message better

Fortunately AI is taking care of that on its own https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07566-y

Google will never rank fediverse posts high. Said otherwise, the external incentives are not there either.

There are cooperatives and I haven’t seen any of them so such spamming. The fediverse is an example of it too.

Yet you didn’t respond to the point that makes the difference:

reddit is actively encouraging this kind behaviour to inflate their user statistics and there is no incentive to tolerate this kind of spam for a fediverse server admin

The correct phrase you should use is not “forgetting”, but “under a never-ending disinformation attack.” https://xcancel.com/U24_gov_ua/status/2012985732265091278#m This is the reality of anyone having to deal with Ruzzia, and the fediverse is also under continuous pressure from botnets.

It showed up now, so I guess it was a matter of synchronisation (9 hours is a lot of time). Probably also has to do with the fact that there’s low usage, so few “pull” attempts. I’m not very clear on what are the triggers.

Anyway, your feedback is very useful and now I know that I should be able to see traces in the container logs of lemmy backend.

That post is now deleted from bluesky, but here is how responses arrive there: https://qoto.org/@mapto/115891523549777312

Well, having an illustrated web page where it is simply explained how mastodon users can use lemmy as the equivalent of facebook groups would also give us pretty good exposure. Most mastodon users don’t know the difference between mastodon and the fediverse.

Sure, these are two very different usability paradigms, but I think they are very well integrated by treating both groups and users on Lemmy as users on Mastodon. Mastodon and Lemmy are the vanilla examples, but a.gup.pe and mbin in show that the two coexist quite smoothly. It is “only” a question of how to map this onto BridgyFed.

How about bridging over to bluesky? If they could follow and comment threads, the userbase explodes 10-fold (compared to the current exposure to mastodon).

See this thread: https://github.com/snarfed/bridgy-fed/issues/372

I see lemmy as groups for mastodon. It has the same affordances as a.gup.pe did.

More information in English about the wider network: https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidhambling/2024/06/07/how-volunteers-worldwide-are-helping-ukraines-war-with-3d-printers/

I’ve gone through a similar experience with two instances. Eventually they both approved. It just took them ages. Of course I needed only one.