Jasne, że nie. Po prostu lubię zbierać dowody na to, co firma od niegdysiejszego “don’t be evil” faktycznie uważa za swój interes. Tak na prawdę mają wybór, mają kolosalne pieniądze, mają potężną imigrancką siłę roboczą, ale oczywiście ponad wszystko mają interes akcjonariuszy. Koniec końców pieniądze zawsze będą po stronie bardziej brutalnych i nieludzkich.

Ciekawe, może to zahamuje rozwój nowych modnych frameworków (nie będzie pytań o nie na stackoverflow to chatskibidi nie będzie skąd miał brać odpowiedzi, więc vibekoderzy nie będą w stanie nic napisać i koło się zamknie…).

Let me guess, they sunk their battleship?

Bo pisząc artykuł za darmo o 7 rano po nieprzespanej nocy mogę niechcący pominąć jakiś niuans #fakecomment?

Jeśli przetestowałeś, że faktycznie tak to działa to mogę dorzucić info. Ale jeśli federacja jest widoczna dla jednego usera a nie całej instancji, to jest to dalej taka sama forma cenzury jak dla mnie.

One could argue the design choices themselves are hardcoded opinions, as it would be possible to imagine for example a more democratic way to moderate.

Pretty sure that’s not the case for my region, so what do you base that opinion on?

Since to my understanding, and their occasional border shootout USSR and PRC were not particularly distant, I understand you’re pitching them against EU/USA? So bourgeois nation states, one established by religious puritans by means of a continent wide genocide, have some distinct advantage over 70+ years of communism, is your point?

So a decade? And never really thereafter?

We have a yearly pride in my country, just as well as very little rights for LGBTQ and the biggest fascist march in Europe, what are you trying to prove with this? And you well know what I’m on about, as your knee-yerk reaction proves in itself.

So supporting all sexualities and genders as in USSR or PRC?

Thanks :) Ive a better one with a siluette of my partner against its backdrop, but its private. And managed to kill these damn lights.

Well, picked one lf the best, most were by the line of this:
and as far as phone cameras go I’ve got a preaty good one and had it set right. True, I didn’t have any gear for stabilisation, and being somewhat intoxicated might not help my skills to shine (framing in fig. 1 should prove that point) but did it over objects, and such. Well, anyway my point is its much better watched than wasted on attempting to get a hundred pics of :)

Had my own chance a month ago, and they are a pain to get a good photo of without a proper camera. Thats the best i had from a particularly strong one according to some locals. Most other pics are just to “moved”. Best advice when using mobile seems to be to set for night mode/long exposure, make one or two attempts, don’t even bother with video unless is brighter then streetlamps and then drop the equipment and just take it in. Spent far to much time trying to get a national geographic class of a shots…

Yeah, do we go with killing fields for all uneducated products of conservative patriarchal cultures? Like, do we have to exterminate some ~5 billion people right away, or is education an option? Also, you ready to do the killing? What you waitng for?
Or is empty radicalism with no actual education on the basics of the ideology you claim to follow enough for you? Please do read some (even basics on the militant side like Bakunin, Machno, Malatesta et all) and come back with any actual understanding of what we’re up against before trying to lecture others, and def. before sentencing them to death.

Pretty sure there were quite a few exceptions to our unwavering solidarity and mutual aid, as McKinley, a bunch of factory owners, Spanish putchists, Ukraininan whites and reds, Chinese monarchy loyalists might have noticed before their deaths. Or how exactly do you expect to “stomp out” “any behavior that treats another human as less valuable”? Also lovely that you’d do it “in order to adhere to anarchist principle”, follow us or die, am I right comrade?

As a queer person who started their antifa activity over twenty years ago defending LGBTQ marches baseball bat in hand I find this post fucken hillarious.

This dosnt even register at such levels for me but around my parts a lot of gay humour is based around use and abuse of slur terms, also to take them back, as was done with “gay” or “queer”. Hardly anyone but closeted selfhating guys and the instagram raised youth would have a problem with implying a right wing politician is gay. Preferably in their “gayest” voice to a bunch of terriefied normies. It also might be true for a key figure of our national politics, but that’s another story.

Because most of the staunchest homophobes are gay man with very serious problems with it, followed by weak minded guys trying to be more manly it makes sense to hit that. Addressing and poking fun at that from our, known to be overly “correct” side puts them out of balance, causes rifts, suspicion and rises pressure in their own groups leading to more conflicts and divisions, therby limiting their reach. In my country we had stirred such gossip on purpouse and involuntarily outed some of far right leaders, so now the suspicion persists in their ranks. Their weapon was turned against them.
Even if you have more issues with such aproach then people who’d been oppressed most their life: it is in fact a war comrade, and you better get around to what that actually means. No one gets out of one both morally impeccable and alive.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iS-0Az7dgRY

Might have been a smoking accident. We might never know.

Would be interesting if someone checked what % of that archive is slopified.