• 0 Posts
  • 228 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 24th, 2023

help-circle









  • Sometimes it seems like it is less “protect the children” as it is “keep the children unsullied for the pedophile overlords” that is just being packaged as “protect the children.” It also seems like the aspiring overlord class wants to track all of the desired slave class to reduce the chances of guillotines. But a lot of how it’s allowed to take hold (in the west, at least) is because of the Abrahamic cult programming so many people still get while they’re too young to look at it critically.

    I recognize I come across as a raving conspiracy nut. Perhaps more sedately, I would phrase it this way: the use of heavily hierarchical mythology in early childhood installs belief systems that make the population much more likely to be eager to live within hierarchical social environments that serve the agendas of those best positioned to run, control, and benefit from a hierarchical world. And the mythology positions an unsullied, pure child as highly valued, making both “protect the children” effective, and making “violate the unsullied to prove your power” desirable goals and easy manipulations.

    Either way, any long-term solution is more likely to come from eliminating that hierarchical mythology before critical thinking is developed than any kind of universal ID, or the ridiculous OS level age API California is trying to force into play.

    Sorry for the rant.










  • I am going to need some explanations. First, they say there are 510 dwellings per 1000 adults, and then they say there are 1017 dwellings per 1000 households. In the first number, that requires more than two adults per dwelling. That deems like we haven’t hit demand yet, let alone surplus. The second numbers are only possible if there are hundreds of thousands of extra adults beyond a couple in most households. Or hundreds of thousands of homeless adults. None of those imply to me any kind of surplus. So I don’t see a source of downward pressure based on over supply. If those 17 dwellings per thousand households are sitting empty, and we have homeless people, then either those 17 are uninhabitable, or they are unaffordable relative to the mode or median incomes.

    Why doesn’t increasing affordable supply help solve that issue?

    The solution suggestions do make sense, it is the argument that there isn’t a supply shortage that has missing pieces.