Oh shoot, I thought they were saying chè with guava

Also Deer Hunter.

What kind of maniac has one of those in his pockets at all times?

Tody ws good dy.

I took it to mean suicide. I can’t imagine what else it would mean.

The biggest problem is updates. The game may be amazing and pristine, but vX.Y rolls around and includes a bunch of ads. Everybody already paid for it and already invested dozens or hundreds of hours into the game, so what are they supposed to do? They have a personal stake in something and then had the rug pulled. Online marketplaces seem to have made this kind of bad faith behavior much more common. I find it so hard to trust even the companies behind great products because of how common these kinds of bait and switch behaviors have become.

YT;DW. Anybody have a summary?

Is this The Constant Gardener all over again?

Same. I’ve been using Firefox as my primary or secondary browser since early 2000’s. No longer.

Too late. I switched to librewolf.

At this point shouldn’t it be fuck MRAPs or fuck tanks?

Is it really cyberpunk if it’s not a lowlife main character?

Are they ever going to finish covering sunset reservoir with solar?

I thought this would be the one where he plays the guitar.

Also:

https://eyeofthesquid.com/ai-is-breaking-the-moral-foundation-of-modern-society-a145d471694f

AI renders [Rawls’ and Nozick’s] disagreement moot by violating the premise they shared. When your talents become training data harvested without consent, when your creative work becomes parameters in a model, you’re being used as a pure instrument. Not for social benefit (Rawls’s concern) and not with your voluntary consent (Nozick’s requirement). You’re raw material extracted for someone else’s capital accumulation. Both philosophers would recognize this as the instrumentalization they were trying to prevent.

YOU WOULDN’T STEAL A FONT!

https://hackaday.com/2025/04/25/you-wouldnt-steal-a-font/

Exactly. What do we expect from the bloody death cult?

Also, just because they have that feature now doesn’t mean they will have it in the future.

It’s like saying “yes we gave you a loaded weapon but we have a safety which you can manually engage” and the implication there is “it’s not our responsibility if it somehow disengages. Also we may remove the safety entirely at some point in the future.”

How about not giving people a loaded weapon if they don’t want one?

/me cries in envious freedom tears

deleted by creator