• 6 Posts
  • 237 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 25th, 2023

help-circle











  • I reject the premise. People have varying strengths of their immune system outside of autoimmune diseases, they’re not equal. One person’s natural ability to fight off a disease is not the same as another’s. Immune systems also can get overwhelmed. People can even get multiple viruses at the same time.

    While scientifically, if I’m not mistaken, natural immunity tends to be a stronger form of immunity once the person survives a disease, surviving the disease is of course not a guarantee for anyone. Vaccination, when available, reduces the chance a person dies to a disease in the same way that warning somebody about something allows them to take preparatory action.

    Prefer? Vaccination every time if available. I don’t like getting diseases my body has to scramble to fight.









  • dormedas@lemmy.dormedas.comtoProgrammer Humor@programming.devIt was
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Sure, nature took its course, but did NATs make things better? I’m a game dev and getting two computers to talk to each other is so so much harder due to NAT traversal, requiring punchthrough servers. Voice chat and stuff need STUN/TURN servers. A game has to account for “what if my host wants to connect two clients, one of which within the NAT and one without?”

    Makes far more sense to give every device an address and just talk to it and leave security and port openness up to firewalls.