@davel - eviltoast

ℭ𝔥𝔦𝔫𝔤𝔞 𝔩𝔞 𝔐𝔦𝔤𝔯𝔞

Pronouns he/him
Datetime Format RFC 3339

Imperial shill list

Username Start End
tardigrade@scribe.disroot.org Nov 2025 -
Sepia@mander.xyz Nov. 2025
Scotty@scribe.disroot.org Aug. 2025
Hotznplotzn@lemmy.sdf.org Jan. 2025
randomname@scribe.disroot.org Jan. 2025
Anyone@slrpnk.net Jan. 2025 Apr. 2025
0x815@feddit.org Jun. 2024 Dec. 2024
thelucky8@beehaw.org Apr. 2024 Jan. 2025
0x815@feddit.de Apr. 2023 Jun. 2024
tardigrada@beehaw.org May 2022 Dec. 2024
  • 441 Posts
  • 6.16K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 8th, 2023

help-circle
  • Davel@lemmy.mltoMemes@lemmy.mlGenocide is an American Tradition
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    Damn, I’d never even heard of Turanism, though I am a little familiar with the debunked 19th century linguistics.

    Turanism, also known as Turanianism, pan-Turanism or pan-Turanianism, is a pan-nationalist political movement built around pseudoscientific claims of biological and linguistic connections between various ethnic groups of Eurasia. It revolves around the abandoned proposal of a Ural-Altaic language family, which hypothesizes that the Turkic, Mongolic, Tungusic, and Uralic peoples share Inner and Central Asian origins and therefore close cultural, ethnic, and linguistic bonds. Supporters of Turanism propose political unity among these groups, chiefly to oppose the cultural and political influences of the Indo-Europeans of Europe, West Asia, and South Asia, as well as the Sino-Tibetans of East Asia. The movement emerged in the 19th century to counter pan-nationalist ideologies such as pan-Germanism, and built upon the ideas of pan-Slavism (e.g. the idea of a “Turanian brotherhood and collaboration” was borrowed from the pan-Slavic concept of “Slavic brotherhood and collaboration”).
















  • While there has been a taboo against the changing of borders in Africa due to legitimate reasons, it became accepted that South Sudan should be created

    Wut.

    What is going on with the passive voice here? With whom has there been this taboo, and why did they think they had the power or legitimacy to define borders in the first place? The Berlin Conference? This sounds like 19th century white man’s burden shit.