Can 'o Beans — Into the Fediverse

  • 0 Posts
  • 20 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 9th, 2023

help-circle
  • I run Proxmox on my router (an Intel NUC) with an OpenWRT VM (though I used to run OPNSense, and might try going back to it later). It makes things more complicated, but I’m familiar enough with Proxmox that I’m okay with that complexity.

    Setup right, I don’t think you’d experience any performance hit in terms of your network, and your 8th gen i7 is likely better than my Celeron J4025, so I imagine your Web UIs will be fast enough even virtualized.

    I virtualized my router because it let me experiment with different router options way more easily (I could switch from OPNSense to OpenWRT and fall back on my old OPNSense VM if I messed anything up, I could setup VLANs in a cloned VM and fallback to my old VM if I couldn’t get it working, etc.). I’m a very indecisive person loll. But if there’s no reason for you to virtualize it, then I wouldn’t bother unless you just want to.

    I vaguely remember my Intel NIC gave problems with OPNSense, but running virtualized meant I could use Linux drivers (via Proxmox) and give OPNSense a VirtIO NIC that it would be happy with. Oh, and it’s nice being able to run the Unifi Web Server in an LXC on the router so it doesn’t go down whenever I mess with my server PC.

    Personally, I only run network-specific things on my Proxmox instance on the router (so, OpenWRT/OPNSense, and the Unifi Web Server). My more home-lab stuff is run on a completely separate machine. Like others have said, I don’t want my internet to go down when I mess with my server.

    If you do end up virtualizing ur router, in my personal experience using VirtIO network devices for the VM seems to work best for me (the E1000 seemed to hamper my upload/download speeds quite a bit, VirtIO made it pretty much line-speed — that could just be OpenWRT quirks or my NIC, idk).




  • I prefer buying CDs for music & physical games for my consoles when I can (physical games on PC is kind of a distant dream now…). For TV, I think the only option to actually own your media is through BluRay/DVD. The digital stores (like Amazon, Vudu i think?) only let you watch on their platform & don’t give you any files.

    I do have a small number of vinyls & cassettes, but that’s more for novelty than any practicality.



  • I don’t think the Pro 2 has gyro, no. Other models might though, I haven’t looked at their offerings for a good while now, lol.

    Never mind, I looked it up and apparently the Pro 2 has gyro in Switch mode. I’ll try it out on my PC and report back, lol. (I’ve never really bothered with gyro, tbh)

    Edit: Yeah, I can’t get gyro working. In Switch mode (wired), my PC doesn’t see the controller at all (on Linux 6.12, so it should have drivers for the Nintendo Pro controller — I’ve read that driver has issues with 3rd party controllers anyway, so…)

    Interestingly, in “A” mode it shows up as a DS4 controller, but I don’t see any gyro input with it under both Sudachi & RPCS3.

    So, maybe it works, but I can’t get it working in under ½ an hour 😅


  • I’ve got an 8BitDo Pro2. I really like it, but I used to have problems connecting it over Bluetooth (wired would work perfectly fine.)

    It just needed a firmware update. You’d probably be fine now (I’ve had my controller for a long time now, and rarely ever gave it an update), but if you experience connection problems with it, I’d try updating the firmware.

    After doing that, my controller has worked like a champ ever since.











  • There’s a concept called Embrace, Extend, Extinguish (seemingly coined, in that form, in a Microsoft antitrust lawsuit). Here’s the Wikipedia page on it: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embrace,_extend,_and_extinguish

    As I understand, people argue that Facebook/Meta, via Threads, will use this strategy in the long-term to either kill, or make effecitvely obsolete, the open technology behind Mastodon. If not that, then they could easily make the federation part of Threads buggy & unreliable, souring their users’ opinions on the “fediverse”.

    They don’t need to control anyone; they only need to host a majority of the userbase (by being the most popular federated site). And they’re not starting from a user count of 1 or 10, unlike a lot of Mastodon sites.

    Obviously, Mastodon & Lemmy, and the sites that run them, can keep chugging along just fine, but it’s argued that if Meta makes their federation implementation sub-par (or otherwise sabotages it), it’ll hurt the user-base growth of sites that use these projects (as people will see begin to see it as unreliable or what-not).

    Is it as doom and gloom as people make it seem? Idk, I haven’t had time to care.