There are no download managers because it is unlikely you are still on dial-up in 2026. There are no torrent clients because they would consume a lot of traffic and battery (unless they are leech-only that would break the whole torrent ecosystem).

LOLWHAT? Signals in Windows?

For Linux, I see only messages about SIGTERM handling, not SIGHUP.

Are there similar cases in the wild?

I live in another country, however the idea is the same as I wrote above: this all is about direct copying.

So what is the case we are speaking about? “Hey LLM, write the OS kernel that is fully compatible with Linux, designed like Linux, uses the same algorithms as Linux and the same code style as Linux”?

So, everything depends on how you define substantial similarities. My opinion is that if there are no copy-and-pasted chunks of code (except for trivial), there are no substantial similarities.

It’s not the topic we discussed, right?

Also, what if one implement proprietary software that is completely different from open source project they studied? They still may use knowledge they obtained when studying, e. g. by reusing algorithms, patterns or even code formatting. This is a common case for LLM coding assistants.

There’s no such a word as plagiarism in free licenses nor in copyright laws. One could violate copyrights or patents or not. Copyleft licenses do not forbid what you call plagiarism. If you want to forbid this as well as training LLMs on your code, you need a new type of license. However I’m unsure if such a license could be considered free by FSF or approved by OSI.

One of the four essential freedoms is the freedom to study the software and modify it. Studying means training your brain on the open source code. Can one use their brain to write proprietary code after they studied some copylefted code?

Passphrase-protected SSH keys are definetely more secure than passwords.

Is it Linux’s fault that Mozilla hasn’t fixed bug #336193 for almost 20 years?

Stubby.

Your family will hate you if you’ll change their distro and DE every time you visit them. Distro hopping is normal for the first couple of years, but do it on your own machine.

Why custom? There’s 6.17 in trixie-backports.

What is n8n?

I mean not much difference in hardware support.

Ubuntu is the wrong choice for any server.

In general, I agree. But I don’t want do participate in holy wars.

Don’t expect much difference between Debian and Ubuntu. I guess you just need to install a newer kernel package from backports.

I’ve read the article you pointed to. What is written there and what you wrote here are absolutely different things. Docker does integrate with firewalld and creates a zone. Have you tried configuring filters for that zone? Ufw is just too dumb because it is suited for workstations that do not forward packets at all, so it cannot be integrated with docker by design.

What does dpkg --print-foreign-architectures say?