The emptiness of the pitcher is symbolic of the meaninglessness of the meme.

You’ve got six fingers on your left hand. Somebody is looking for you.

Destroying the shadow fleet is something the US military is doing, and I’m sure trump is doing everything he can to drag his feet.

Maduro had outlived his usefulness, he was a liability; by having the US seize control it doesn’t substantially reduce Russian influence, since Russia now has a much stronger hold over American politicians than back when Venezuela was a vital proxy.

It’s nonsense, and men with longer hair who use 6 in 1 have bad results. Longer hair takes more treatment, hair is usually vitalized by oils from the scalp, so the further away from the scalp the more help it needs to stay healthy.

Especially since 365 is a really stupid part of the name. What is with Microsoft and 360 numbers?

A lot of the other hypotheticals make more sense to me than this one. The raccoon is dying already, you just need to avoid it. A gun isn’t even the most effective tool for this problem, it’s a small moving target. Trap it.

I am strongly anti assassination, but if not for the assassination of William McKinley we probably would never have got Teddy Roosevelt, who was instrumental in busting the trusts and restoring balance to the economy.

A restroom for girls with penises.

Bird is slang for girl, Bee = B for Boy

War never changes.

What a hottie!

Brain chips no, but maybe through some sort of trans cranial stimulation, like in cyberpunk novels?

I mean they mostly used it for textures, right? Those are often generated from a combination of noise and photography, it’s not like they were building the game out of lego bricks of other people’s art.

I don’t see how it’s significantly different than sampling in music, it’s just some background detail to enhance the message of the art.

Obviously modern AI is a nightmare machine that cannot be justified, but I could imagine valid artistic uses for the hypothetical AI you described.

We passed gun regulations in 1934, why can’t we do it again? The same reasoning that makes it illegal for a civilian to own a grenade launcher could apply to other weapons too.

You’re really good at giving people compliments. Keep it up!

Maybe one dress with three differently colored stripes, then you could filter it so each image only showed one pattern and erased the other two.

I think the biggest difference is the cut of the dress.

Jinx confirmed

If being transformative was the only test copyright would be pretty toothless, you could use any copyrighted characters you want as long as you told a new story.

Non-profit, educational, research, criticism, or news reporting; those are the categories that transformative use applies most to. Though for highly creative works (like an original character e.g. Franklin) even those categories are restricted.

The biggest test though is negative market factor. If the publisher can demonstrate it could damage their brand that is enough. Frankly this seems pretty obvious in this case, who wants to read about a fascist turtle?

Fair use does not cover political messaging.