deleted by creator

You can do what you want but kids use bikes too while making unpredictable misjudged decisions.

The US wont ban guns but it has nothing to do with what Trump wants, the moment he blurts out he wants to ban them his caretakers will send someone in that appears intelligence in Trumps perspective and they will convince him otherwise.

Who are you talking too? Not likely to find many here.

Not Open Source…

It is considerably more open and build on open source technologies and they do want to become decentralized “once the open protocols mature (?)” but still, can someone educate the kids on software freedom please.

I instantly read it in the melody of “everything is awesome” from the lego movie if that helps.

I am not sure what you are saying and i don’t think you know what i am saying but i too see alot of myself within you somehow

I am not arguing for a god or any supernatural, like i said i am not religious. I also don’t feel like i am desperately hoping materialism is wrong. I might have years ago.

I do not believe there is an objective good or bad. And if there is a god they are not concerned with morals.

Most of my theory came from grounded observation. You can probably find yourself agreeing with these. They are just a list of statements though, i hope you don’t mind.

The universe is big that from my frame of reference i can only understand it as infinite.

The universe is full of information (everything is information)

Humans only know a fraction of this information

when scientists look at the sky they continue to perceive unexplained phenomena.

I will never know all The secrets of science and we continue to discover things though impossible before.

Any advanced enough technology becomes Indistinguishable from magic.

From this i hope Its enough to say, A human being does not have the capacity to comprehend the complexity of all reality. Everything we think we know Is an approximation of truth and we can always be wrong, always learn more.

I heavily dislike assuming something is not real just because it seem that way from my perspective, i am just some silly ape. What do i know about the value of life, evil or what science may one day make possible or discover. Sometimes i can’t even tell i am dreaming in my sleep.

I don’t believe there is an end of the rainbow. Smiling in this case is a matter of choice

I am sure there is a better format image for this somewhere. I don’t know it though.

More like everyone is 92 because most kids today are smarter then this.

I bet if you showed this case, without political context to a class none would laugh and all would agree its wrong for officials to do this.

If you indulge me the theoretical Thought experiment (i love these)

You wouldn’t know it was real at any point of doing it, and when you end up in the new universe you won’t retain knowledge from this one, you might even wake up in the universe where you never had this idea.

You might live in a universe without Trump but You also wouldn’t know who Trump is. But then if only you could live in a universe where Musk was not the president you would kill for that.

No worried, i am agnostic, spiritual but not at all religious.

I wouldn’t recommend to put much actual trust in any of the human myths you previously studied

I am asking because, i find it noteworthy that within atheism you are still clinging to gnosticism.

Gnostic means you believe something and seem absolutely certain about it.

Agnostic means you are inclined to believe some things, under the knowledge that you could be wrong.

When you say you know how most of the universe is infinite, but then consciousness is without any actual proof an exception to this, then i would interpret that as a religious belief of some kind.

Anyway there are a near infinite ways to interpret reality. To me everything appears emerged from a singular point that factually expanded into many smaller things that can then interact with eachother, from which more interactions emerge till at some point all possible interactions between all possible things have occurred. I call this maximalisation of reality and it came from the tough experiment of if i had infinite space, time and knowledge what would do with it all. The answer was to experience that all. Good, bad, no judgement or goal, just all.

You don’t need to concern yourself with that neither do i suggest you take it as truth but you seem like an open minded person and i think the concept of agnostic spirituality could serve as an inspiration to enhance your view of life without having to pick a fixed truth you cant deviate from.

Quantum suicide implies there is a reality where you found the gun. Killed yourself and then your consciousness, who was in superposition of all realities continues in this branch of reality where you did not find a gun.

Not to make you second guess yourself but it always trips me up when people say they know that there is no post death experience. It seem gnostic.

The shrooms statement could be true for some perspectives and is impossible to proof either way. The idea can be used practically, to understand that death is nothing to worry about and even comfortable can make it easier to live life in the moment. But i have no idea why a healthy person would seek it out because it’l happen on its own for everyone anyway. Might as well live out the magic of this reality now as i experience it.

Its very hard to explain people what good use look like with so many horrible examples around.

Thanks for sticking with for the conversation.

Easy.

Don’t use a public ai model you download from the internet or use other copyrighteded work to train your own model.

You dont really need or even want that much data to get a focused result. The technology is open source and gaming hardware can handle it.

Just because 99.99% of what you see is people doing something dumb and unoriginal using tools that are designed by evil corporations does not mean the concept of what there doing is wrong and that there are not any people who do it right.

The problem right now is, try to find artists who do it right within a climate where everyone will discredit your work out off slop bias.

Consider that most people who do art do not have a public artist identity and just do it for their own private passion (best art) those that use ai definitely have no incentive to share their projects with the world.

Which is a shame making sure that the only works you will see is slop engagement bait

The same concepts that also overlap with designing ai genres art. which is my pointW

Framing is set manually, different generation zones and is quite literally composition.

Adding skeletons with control net to fix a pose, again composition.

Choosing one of 100 different generated sky backgrounds is easier if you know color theory and recognize realism or lack therefor.

Pretty much all mediums of art have these indeed. So does comfyui. Ergo creatively designing ai generated images is art.

I feel like your being incredibly specific about how it applies to one art form.

Ai generation is not drawing. Just like drawing is not woodcarving.

Id like so see pencil or brush skills transfer to photography. Which is a good example because i have taken photos with intentional effect to make them look paintings.

Someone who works abstract without light play does not need to know light theory to be an artist.

If you want to do make the same art on a different medium sure knowledge is transfered but that really depends on what you are trying to do which is different for every creative individual.

In my experience there is knowledge overlap between making photoshop collages and building advanced ai generation flows.

These tools also complement eachother. Generate a specific something, photoshop it into the final product.

Speaking as someone who dabbles with all kinds of art.

What are you talking about? I can’t even begin to make the art i make digitally on paper and i am using a drawing tablet. I heavily use blended layers and may zoom in to the pixel level to meticulously get something perfect.

My used to be art teacher (pencil drawing, digital drawing and tattoos) started lesson 1 with affirming that digital painting is not drawing and you can not use a drawing tablet to draw. They affirmed its its own thing and much closer to painting.

You could raise one point for eye hand coordination holding a pen like item to draw lines there are transferable skills there but for all my digital work, my paper drawings suck, and i don’t even want to think about that guy i know that was actually good on paper, but disliked using a drawing tablet so much he used a mouse to “scratch” drawings on pc instead.

If we are considering experience broader creative techniques there is also the very common (and very fun) art of making collages.

People used to do this with magazines and you needed to be good with scissors. Doing it online eliminated that skill yet public internet images and photoshop actually turned that hobby in an actual career. (I know many magazines where every cover is a photoshopped collage of pictures)

I like to to point this one because in my Own dabbling with ai generated (diy comfyui -not an llm prompt) the creative energy i put in feels much close to making collages, and a little bit like coding. You start with something basic and then you gradually change and mold stuff into intention.

My actual critique of ai generation is actually something much more basic… its just not as fun, its carving a rock that can change shape and sometimes it just sucks.

There is no single sign something is ai.

There are a hundred smaller signs that include both em-dashes, flattery and redundancy.

“it’s reversed in Japan.”