• 22 Posts
  • 188 Comments
Joined 4 years ago
cake
Cake day: January 28th, 2022

help-circle
  • I’m not speaking for the whole Technology mod team here, just off the cuff. I think a satire piece (if clearly labeled preferably) would be completely fine. Personally I’d also be good with funny articles or other types of writing about tech, god knows this sub could use some levity. I don’t think we would probably be okay with posting tech related memes, though. It’s possible that if the community was really interested we could do a weekly sticky for memes or other lower-effort content, though.

    Again, I’m just spitballing here, I haven’t checked it with any of the other mods.


  • Look, I think Trump probably did rape minors. I think he was probably involved in trafficking. But this isn’t really evidence. It’s hearsay, at best. It’s an anonymous complaint filed via an open FBI telephone tipline in 2016. From what I’ve seen, all manner of wild stuff gets reported to those tip lines. There’s absolutely no way of knowing if there’s any truth to this other than the fact that we all have a gut feeling - and have seen lots of circumstantial evidence - that Trump was involved in this kind of stuff. It doesn’t do any good to go around acting like it’s proof of anything, though.








  • I think the problem with anthropomorphizing LLMs this way is that they don’t have intent, so they can’t have responsiblity. If this piece of software had been given the tools to actually kill someone, I think we all understand that it wouldn’t be appropriate to put the LLM on trial. Instead, we need to be looking at the people who are trying to give more power to these systems and dodge responsibility for their failures. If this LLM had caused someone to be killed, then the person who tied critical systems into a black box piece of software that is poorly understood and not fit for the purpose is the one who should be on trial. That’s my problem with anthropomorphizing LLMs, it shifts the blame and responsibility away from the people who are responsible for attempting to use them for their own gain, at the expense of others.




  • Lol, you can tell which commenters have never moderated anything in this thread, IMO. If it weren’t for the high likelihood that these summaries will be wrong an appreciable percentage of the time, this would be a huge help for anyone moderating medium traffic subs. Those types of subs, especially if they have relatively hands-on moderation to keep them from being complete cesspools, often involve seeing a comments or post that is borderline, and feeling like you need to go look through the poster’s history to figure out if they’re a bot or a troll. Something like this that actually worked, especially if it linked back to a sampling of the posts/comments that it is referencing, would be a big help in that. Also something like this that summarized a user’s moderation history would be pretty useful.







  • I can certainly understand wanting to keep your exposure to these topics to a certain time and not be bombarded throughout the day. A lot of us would probably be better off if that was something we could do. That said, I think Gaywallet is right that this will be difficult due to the way that Beehaw is - our communities are a lot broader than ones on, say, reddit or other Lemmy instances for the most part, which means that a “no politics” rule is going to be impractical in a lot of cases.

    How do you normally browse Lemmy/Beehaw? If you’re accessing via browser it may be more difficult, but if you mostly browse on Mobile using a Lemmy app I know that some of them have keyword filters that you might be able to use to catch some of these types of posts. The School Lunch example would probably be difficult, but the other two you could probably have prevented from showing up in your feed with a filter like that.

    When I’m browsing on Android I’ve been using Voyager which I know has a filter like this under “Filters and Blocks” in the settings menu.