• 0 Posts
  • 194 Comments
Joined 11 months ago
cake
Cake day: April 30th, 2025

help-circle








  • IIRC it’s been mathematically proven that no single-member electoral system can be perfect. If it wins in one area it fails in another.

    My preferred system is to use a standard ranked ballot, count it using IRV until every candidate has above 20% and then switch to ranked pairs (so there are no spoilers, but the daylight savings party doesn’t end up winning by default).


  • Proportional representation leads to total chaos at government formation, and in Europe it has largely failed to stop the far-right because it gives the far-right a platform by default. It’s not really a better system than STV. The best system is probably a mix between STV and condorcet.

    I live in Australia. We have STV at federal elections and PR in Tasmania. Tasmania has gone from the strongest economy in the country to the weakest, as a result of PR.

    Anything is better than FPTP though.











  • Australia pressed it, as a result of parents who have genuine concerns about social media addiction in kids (but who aren’t willing to do anything about it themselves).

    And there’s also this which explains why the implementation is the most annoying way possible. If I had my way age-verification would be solely tied to the addictive features of social media, but if that were the case the big tech companies would just lose users and wouldn’t be able to insert themselves as an age-verification middle-man.