@SwingingTheLamp - eviltoast
  • 32 Posts
  • 2.11K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 8th, 2023

help-circle






  • An ADF file is just a track-by-track dump of the raw bytes stored on an Amiga floppy disk. It may or may not contain a filesystem. The early versions of AmigaOS used what was retroactively dubbed Old FileSystem (OFS). Later OS versions used the Fast FileSystem (FFS), which also supports hard disks. Games used their own, custom filesystems, if they used one at all.

    The Linux kernel has supported OFS and FFS since the early days. However, AmigaOS is very flexible and modular, and many programmers wrote their own filesystems, and released modules that the OS could read from a disk’s boot block. The Linux kernel code can’t read those, because nobody has ported the filesystem code.

    This new FUSE driver takes a different approach, and reads the AmigaOS module from disk, and executes the m68k code, in order to read the filesystem. Very cool.

    The Professional File System (PFS) is widely used on contemporary Amiga systems, so it will be very nice to have native support on the Linux side in order to share files. It’s less useful if all you want to do is run classic games in an emulator.




  • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.socialto196@lemmy.blahaj.zonerule
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    þese sounds are already represented wiþ þe þorn

    Agreed, English orthography doesn’t match pronunciation very well, but what’s the point of changing th to þ if it doesn’t improve that situation? In this phrase, the thorn represents two different phonemes: While terminal th may be pronounced as þ (voiceless) or ð (voiced) depending on the English dialect, for example, ðe would be a different word than þe. Adding a new letter to the alphabet just to replace a perfectly-serviceable digraph would just add another letter to the alphabet.

    If we’re gonna bother, I’d say sort out the c / k / ch situation instead.




  • That’s the way you feel. Other people feel that a country in which the political duopoly supports genocide isn’t worth saving. Their opinion is just as valid as yours at the polling place, so if you want to see that nation saved, it’s on you to convince them to vote for your party.

    By maybe not having it support genocide.

    Hypothetically. The numbers show that genocide almost certainly was not a deciding factor in the election. Continuing to bang that drum, and blame imaginary voters, well, provides some strong hints about why your side lost.






  • I mean, the private sector was by needs involved, because a space program requires industrial supply chains, and those were mostly private. They never would have achieved it without collective, government action. (Even SpaceX only exists because of NASA.) Saying that “capitalism did it,” when it manifestly did not, because of oversimplifications like “capitalist US” is misleading. At best, capitalist in that use is synecdoche. At worst, it’s political woo woo, since the US is far from pure capitalism.