Does it have to? If they plan to regulate greenwashing, their draft will probably provide the information needed.

I suspect that there is a certain combination of mountain stone, oxygen, melted water that can contribute into the creation of radioactive gases, but this is not more than a wild guess. Maybe someone really knows something about this.

Probably runs on excatly such systems.

Edit: wait does this allow people to vote from home?..

Yes it does.

Got it, thanks for clarifying.

Which names? Did we read a different article?

Thanks for looking it up, i appreciate it. As i understand it the main discussion is about the price and not which of them are greener. But i see the versatility of rechargeable batteries - you don’t need to have contact wires everywhere.

Interesting. Do you know, if they added the creation and maintenance into the the calculation of the catenary lines?

Fair enough. Maybe they look to innovate train transportation even further. For example i know that in certain places, they still use coal trains, because they haven’t rebuild the line to have electricity. This could give a boost to switch some old coal trains to hydrogen. Without the power lines, your much faster and more flexible in building train lines.

Sure, if it is the cheapest, people will go that route and there will always be people that do things like this, you can’t stop that. But as always, there will come restrictions and regulations - like in europe with fossil fuel cars.

If availability isn’t high enough, we have to make sure it is in one way or another. And since there is money to make - more will try to come up with a solution to the problem.

In my opinion, it is the same with any other topic, where we to less of something - make the demand higher and people will get creative and try to earn money out of it.

More news on the case: https://www.srf.ch/news/schweiz/feuer-im-oberwallis-wind-nimmt-wieder-zu-waldbrand-noch-nicht-unter-kontrolle