For most of those things you can just… make more… or wait your turn.

I was doing this so thoroughly with one DM once, and - on account of my enthusiasm, I think - it took him two or three sessions before he told me he just doesn’t give a shit if I count them.

I had to check, but voyager, evidently.

I’m not saying they’re “rich”. I’m saying they’re not, as OP suggests, proletarian.

Everything Trump does reminds me of Bush.

Eah. A lot of “farmers” are land owners who hire other people to work on their farms. The average net worth of an American farming household is like, north of $1.5 million iirc.

I’m noy saying money doesn’t matter, but Kamala Harris outspent Trump by, like, 2:1 iirc in 2024 and still lost. Clearly money is not the only factor.

So you’re saying that thorn guy might be on to somthing?

That’d be an effective total ban, because noone would want to be on a social media platform with entierly 80+ year olds. It’d be all corny minion memes.

Updootes for Lil Bill. Lil Bill is awesome.

If some manager at a store can find the huevos do it, your state politicians can find em too. js.

a million dollar company is, what, like, 10 employees?

David Graber suggests in Debt: The First 5000 Years, that the way you get someone to do something truely awful to another human is to hang a debt over their head so they feel that someone else is making them do it.

There is no universe where that guy was going to be Trump’s successor. Nobody likes him, he’s only there now because Peter Thiel believe he will allow him to replace humanity with robots or something.

So… no more Irish or Norwegian immigrants?

I recently played through GW1, and yeah, 100% worth a replay. Really fun. Some of the last few missions were surprisingly hard. Still has an active community too.

No. Go read the source material more carefully. I’ve checked like 5 of the trackers and not a single one I’ve read reports a single actual, verifiable death. Ita pure math. That doesn’t mean there aren’t deaths, it just means this is a purely mathematical estimate. The discussion should be “is this estimate reasonable”, not “lets assume this estimate is reasonable and talk about how bad Trump is”.

If you want to understand conflicts, you need to read about their history.

I took a look at the tracker they’re using as a source, and this appears to be (for the few categories I checked the methodology for) referring to mathematically projected deaths, and not literal counted dead humans. I think that’s a pretty important note, especially if we’re titling it “at least 600,000 dead”. I’m not saying noone died, but “I’ve used math to estimate that half a million people died based on this set of assumptions” is a very different statement from “We have tallied up literally half a million dead people over here explicitly because of USAID going away”

I mean, you’re have to be pretty good to lose that hard… or buy penny stocks or something.