

Even if he did, so what? He was licensed to carry, did not brandish and was attempting to enjoy his rights under the First and Second amendments.
I dislike guns. But I’m in Texas, so I simply presume that I’m in a space with people packing while in public. Still, here’s a nurse who felt a need to go through the legal system to have a gun on him in case of, well …
On the other side, we have poor training for ICE and a shockingly high rejection rate for the quality they manage to attract.
I’m going to side with the nurse every time. And whether he had a holstered gun is irrelevant to the fact that he was murdered.







:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():focal(749x0:751x2)/ice-conditions204-012326-5ebd8cd288074a48b4cc9509405c068c.jpg)













The irony here is rich. They’re supposedly supposed to be ensuring our right to bear arms for precisely this sort of situation.
Now, against the military, a 9mm is somewhat useless. But they swore an oath to the Constitution, and so far as I’m aware, the armed forces as a whole commit fealty to that, not a pathetic guy who can somehow bankrupt casinos.