• 0 Posts
  • 23 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: January 2nd, 2025

help-circle





  • Hmm. Maybe the core guide could remain comprehensive but have multiple “fast tracks”? Like a Marxist Feminism fast-track that takes only the most necessary readings from the first sections and jumps to a focus on feminism. Or an imperialism fast-track that gives you the most direct and shortest route to understanding imperialism in the 21st century, etc.

    This might work with different target audiences who are curious about the ML stance on certain issues, but are not convinced or interested enough to do, for example, 40 hours of reading to understand why you say that the EU is an imperialist project but China is not.

    I’m sure you already considered something similar, I read the comments you wrote on thinking about separating history to another list, but I’m not sure. Just a thought.




  • I don’t have enough experience to give recommendations, but I could post my raw impressions going down the list in case it’s helpful:

    I think having an estimated reading length timer similar to Red Sails next to each title would be useful. Especially for Section 0 which includes some very short reads, but people might think they have hours ahead of them before Section 1. I used this website sometimes to give myself an idea before diving into a book: https://www.readinglength.com/.

    Not a criticism, just a note: I’m surprised to find Socialism: Utopian and Scientific relatively far down the list. I think it was the first work on socialism I’d ever read, lol.

    The order of Section 6 in relation to 7 and 8 is a bit of a tough one, I think. Should works on LGBTQIA+ liberation and colonialism be so far down the list? I’m not sure. I’d like to hear your perspective.



  • Thanks for the response! I really like how you’re approaching this where you’re giving the reader an immediately applicable understanding of current world events and contradictions, rather than what feels like an academic course on Marxist theory.

    I believe this would help many people understand that reading theory isn’t about being immersed in abstract and detached concepts in books. It should give them tools to be used in their everyday life, as well as provide a clear vision of the goals we need to accomplish while learning from past failures and successes.


  • I find the revisions very interesting. Would you elaborate on what you learned over the past few months that inspired you to make these changes? When you have the time, of course.

    In my own circles I usually recommend Blackshirts and Reds as first or second because it counters the “socialism bad and failed everywhere” attitude that most people have by default.

    My thinking is that many people would be apprehensive of reading anything by Lenin or Mao if they come with that perspective. I’d appreciate your thoughts on this!