Why do you expect a tiny country to expose itself when others 100x more powerful won’t?
I don’t? They could have just stayed out of it but chose to “expose” themselves just now when it was convenient. If you’re not going to speak up against injustice then don’t, but then own it. Don’t come swooping down like a vulture once it’s safe and act like you’re all just and good and “for the people of Venezuela”.
Es schneit -> niemand schaufelt obwohl wir es über die Nebenkosten bezahlen -> es schneit …
Everybody who has to work for a living is part of the working class. Further division is just “divide et impera” by the owners.
Oh, so he’s been convicted by the Hague or another court that might have jurisdiction?
I mean I’m personally sure he’s actually a despicable corrupt dictator and should face consequences, but if this was about international law, Switzerland would have frozen his assets when he supposedly doctored the last election, not when he’d just conveniently been illegally kidnapped and couldn’t fight back. This is clearly about appeasing the orange rapist and nothing else.
It certainly means not taking sides in other’s conflicts.
Mit Menschlichkeit überzeugen du halt keine Unionswähler, für die ist das wirtschaftliche Argument schon das Richtige.
Ich war letztes Jahr schon auf dem Weg zum Auto, als die Nachricht kam, dass mein Termin abgesagt wurde. Ersatzvorschläge? Hahaha, wo denken Sie hin?
Ergebnis ist, dass ich jetzt erst nächste Woche den nächsten Versuch starte. Mal sehen was diesmal schief geht
Doesn’t sound very neutral to me.
it means that those with the most money in the world will effectively be in power of the world, which is exactly what we see.
Wealth is power, which is why wealth, like power, must be limited.
Everybody who works in advertisement should be reeducated to do some productive work for society instead. Like caring for old people, cleaning parks, repairing roads …
Chairs are fucking expensive though. It’s always like “oh, this table is only 300” “yeah, but the matching chairs are 120 each”
Möchtest du die Torpfosten vielleicht noch etwas weiter verschieben?
Ein Ablehnen eines Völkerrechtswidrigen Angriffes sieht anders aus, ob man ihn nun rückgängig machen kann oder nicht.
If you make a profit on your house, are you a scalper?
If I had never intended to live in it and just speculated on rising prices? Yes. Take your fair share and leave some for others. Your entire reasoning is why the world is such a shithole.
Damit unterstützt sie einen Übergang. Es wäre ja aber gar kein Übergang in Sicht, ohne die Entführung des Staatsoberhaupts durch die USA.
Oh, so it finally broke through whatever enforcement of fascist talking points they had put in place?
It’s not ok to be a scalper just because it’s kid’s toys instead of geforce cards.
he scraps the IHRA definition of antisemitism and lifts restrictions on boycotting Israel.
Which the IHRA itself adopted as a non-legally binding working definition. It is explicitly not meant to be used in a legal context.
Mit der Haltung, dass “nicht diskriminieren” links ist, kommt die AgD an die Macht. Ja, stimmt.
Mein Füahrer, der Angriff ist nicht erfolgt. Steiner konnte nicht effizient genug verbrennen.
No, I suggested this was done in the interest of the orange rapist, which is not the same. Targeting the person currently in his sights is absolutely meant to gain browny points with him (and likely to work for a time). If it was meant to achieve anything else, it could and should have been done much earlier.
Maybe coincidentally. That entirely depends on with whom the assets end up, which remains to be seen.
I did not.