Amnesigenic

According to who exactly?

Housing and food are viewed that way in our capitalist society specifically because it supports the central idea that the poor deserve to be homeless and starving, this view is actively reinforced in our media, I see no reason to do anything other than attack it. Saving for the future is not passive income. If it pays interest someone somewhere is getting fucked for it.

Cope

“To each according to their need” doesn’t necessarily mean pay, you could just provide housing and food directly to people who can’t otherwise afford it. Passive income necessarily requires exploitation and accounts for neither need nor ability.

It means that between communism and capitalism there’s exactly one option that says being paid for labor someone else did is fine and one that doesn’t

Hog, not dog, learn to read

Critical support for your demons

Lol @ the people propping up the system with “passive income” making accusations

No u

If balls were in the back they’d be harder to guard, if they were less sensitive we’d care less about guarding them. Agree about making them bigger though.

Most people have no trouble walking, the invention of the wheelchair was still a step in the right direction because people exist for whom that is not true. A more comprehensible language is objectively better whether it makes a difference for you or not.

Sure thing bud, totally believable

Linguistic drift towards being less comprehensible is objectively bad, fucking duh

Have you perhaps considered crying about it?