• Cattypat@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
    252·
    1 year ago

    Yes. Choosing not to vote for the candidate CLOSER to your beliefs is increasing the voting power of all other voters.

      • aramova@infosec.pubEnglish
        31·
        1 year ago

        My view is picking which is the least dangerous and negatively impacting to the greater good makes a rational argument.

        Standing on the sidelines doesn’t really do anything except make you feel as though you have a voice.

        I’ve just taken the approach of supporting who’s the least insane to keep life livable and making the cases for alternative candidates between.

        Most American alternative options are just so fucking quiet between elections that when one comes around they fall into the “wtf is that?” bucket.

        Only one that’s had a snowballs chance in hell that I remember was Ross Perot in the 90s.

    • InternetCitizen2@lemmy.worldEnglish
      64·
      1 year ago

      Ironically people in this sub have the same enlightened centrist view point they are laughing at. Harm minimization isn’t the goal but it does matter, and they’re letting our movement down overall.